From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: "jeff@garzik.org" <jeff@garzik.org>,
"e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"rogerx@sdf.lonestar.org" <rogerx@sdf.lonestar.org>,
"bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org"
<bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] e1000e: Use device_set_wakeup_enable
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:42:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811041742.35269.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811041740.50426.rjw@sisk.pl>
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: e1000e: Use device_set_wakeup_enable
Since dev->power.should_wakeup bit is used by the PCI core to
decide whether the device should wake up the system from sleep
states, set/unset this bit whenever WOL is enabled/disabled using
e1000_set_wol(). Accordingly, use device_can_wakeup() for checking
if wake-up is supported by the device.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c | 8 ++++++--
drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c
@@ -1713,7 +1713,8 @@ static void e1000_get_wol(struct net_dev
wol->supported = 0;
wol->wolopts = 0;
- if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_WOL))
+ if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_WOL) ||
+ !device_can_wakeup(&adapter->pdev->dev))
return;
wol->supported = WAKE_UCAST | WAKE_MCAST |
@@ -1751,7 +1752,8 @@ static int e1000_set_wol(struct net_devi
if (wol->wolopts & WAKE_MAGICSECURE)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_WOL))
+ if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_WOL) ||
+ !device_can_wakeup(&adapter->pdev->dev))
return wol->wolopts ? -EOPNOTSUPP : 0;
/* these settings will always override what we currently have */
@@ -1770,6 +1772,8 @@ static int e1000_set_wol(struct net_devi
if (wol->wolopts & WAKE_ARP)
adapter->wol |= E1000_WUFC_ARP;
+ device_set_wakeup_enable(&adapter->pdev->dev, adapter->wol);
+
return 0;
}
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -4970,6 +4970,7 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct
/* initialize the wol settings based on the eeprom settings */
adapter->wol = adapter->eeprom_wol;
+ device_set_wakeup_enable(&adapter->pdev->dev, adapter->wol);
/* reset the hardware with the new settings */
e1000e_reset(adapter);
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-11865-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-10-28 5:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 11865] New: WOL for E100 Doesn't Work Anymore Andrew Morton
2008-11-03 19:04 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-11-03 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 0:47 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-11-04 1:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 16:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] WOL fixes for e1000e, e1000 and igb (was: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11865] New: WOL for E100 Doesn't Work Anymore) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 16:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-11-04 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] e1000: Use device_set_wakeup_enable Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] igb: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-05 19:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] WOL fixes for e1000e, e1000 and igb (was: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11865] New: WOL for E100 Doesn't Work Anymore) Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-11-07 0:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-08 6:30 [PATCH 1/3] e1000e: Use device_set_wakeup_enable Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811041742.35269.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerx@sdf.lonestar.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).