From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: tbench wrt. loopback TSO Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:04:05 +0300 Message-ID: <20081105130405.GA26435@ioremap.net> References: <20081105114900.GA18691@ioremap.net> <20081105.035454.87914782.davem@davemloft.net> <20081105.040943.03609283.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , Netdev , efault@gmx.de, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, Herbert Xu To: Ilpo =?utf-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= Return-path: Received: from broadrack.ru ([195.178.208.66]:46830 "EHLO tservice.net.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750793AbYKENEM (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 08:04:12 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 02:25:57PM +0200, Ilpo J=C3=A4rvinen (ilpo.jarv= inen@helsinki.fi) wrote: > The problem is that we'd need to _resegment with the next skb_ since = the=20 > mss boundary and skb boundary would basically constantly be running=20 > out-of-sync. That won't get done currently by anything. Btw, what's that wrong if there will be sub-mss frame per tso frame? --=20 Evgeniy Polyakov