[1/3] IRDA: Create new field tx_extra in skbuff

[1/3] IRDA: Create new field tx_extra in skbuff

[Alex Villací­s Lasso]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1955 bytes --]

For background, see regression report at 
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11795

This patchset attempts to fix a regression that broke the irda stack as 
a result of the qdisc patches merged in 2.6.27.

The previous patchsets attempt to fix the clobbering of the irda 
information by storing it within the data payload itself, as an 
additional header. For this, space has been allocated via skb_pull (?!) 
and later, skb_reserve(). The problem with this approach is that  we do 
not have a guarantee that all skbuffs that are processed in the irda 
stack are actually allocated with functions that reserve the required 
space for the irda metadata, especially in the tx route. In addition, 
this approach mixes the payload data with metadata that should not be 
transmitted at all, which is a bit disorganized.

This is the first of 3 patches that try a different approach. Instead of 
allocating an additional "header" within the data buffer itself, it 
introduces a new field within the skbuff, named tx_extra. This field 
should be used for passing data from the higher layers that is required 
for the drivers to transmit the packet correctly, and formalizes the 
previous usage of the cb field by the irda stack. The only issue I see 
is that every single skbuff carries an additional 32 bytes which are not 
put to any use in other stacks (for now). I was thinking about a pointer 
field to on-the-fly allocated data, but that means messing around with 
the skbuff allocation functions, the cloning functions (involving 
deciding how to behave on cloning), etc. This way is simpler to understand.

This patch and the other two that follow fix the issue for me under 
2.6.28-rc3. Please comment on this, as I am messing around with the 
skbuff structure, which potentially affects all network stacks.

Signed-off-by: Alex Villacís Lasso <a_villacis@palosanto.com>

-- 
perl -e '$x=2.4;print sprintf("%.0f + %.0f = %.0f\n",$x,$x,$x+$x);'


[-- Attachment #2: 0001-irda-Introduce_skbuff_tx_extra.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1237 bytes --]

diff -ur linux-2.6.28-rc3-git-orig/include/linux/skbuff.h linux-2.6.28-rc3-git/include/linux/skbuff.h
--- linux-2.6.28-rc3-git-orig/include/linux/skbuff.h	2008-11-06 19:44:23.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.28-rc3-git/include/linux/skbuff.h	2008-11-08 11:47:46.000000000 -0500
@@ -279,6 +279,14 @@
 	 */
 	char			cb[48];
 
+	/*
+	 * Additional space for layer-specific variables that need to
+	 * survive past dev_queue_xmit(), which clobbers cb above.
+	 * Intended for use by drivers that need additional layer-specific
+	 * parameters in order to transmit a packet properly.
+	 */
+	char			tx_extra[32];
+
 	unsigned int		len,
 				data_len;
 	__u16			mac_len,
diff -ur linux-2.6.28-rc3-git-orig/include/net/irda/irda_device.h linux-2.6.28-rc3-git/include/net/irda/irda_device.h
--- linux-2.6.28-rc3-git-orig/include/net/irda/irda_device.h	2008-11-06 19:44:23.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.28-rc3-git/include/net/irda/irda_device.h	2008-11-08 11:55:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -230,6 +230,12 @@
 
 void irda_setup_dma(int channel, dma_addr_t buffer, int count, int mode);
 
+
+static inline struct irda_skb_cb *irda_get_skb_cb(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return (struct irda_skb_cb *)skb->tx_extra;
+}
+
 /*
  * Function irda_get_mtt (skb)
  *

Re: [1/3] IRDA: Create new field tx_extra in skbuff

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

Hi Alex.

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:09:33AM -0500, Alex Villací­s Lasso (avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec) wrote:
> The previous patchsets attempt to fix the clobbering of the irda 
> information by storing it within the data payload itself, as an 
> additional header. For this, space has been allocated via skb_pull (?!) 
> and later, skb_reserve(). The problem with this approach is that  we do 
> not have a guarantee that all skbuffs that are processed in the irda 
> stack are actually allocated with functions that reserve the required 
> space for the irda metadata, especially in the tx route. In addition, 
> this approach mixes the payload data with metadata that should not be 
> transmitted at all, which is a bit disorganized.

Do all irda transfers require that additional data?
You can simply change MAX_HEADER macro to be bigger than that size
if it has to be larger than existing the biggest ax25 layer, which I
doubt it has to.

This data is always allocated for all transmitted skbs. Reserve is also
properly done in sending functions.

> This is the first of 3 patches that try a different approach. Instead of 
> allocating an additional "header" within the data buffer itself, it 
> introduces a new field within the skbuff, named tx_extra. This field 
> should be used for passing data from the higher layers that is required 
> for the drivers to transmit the packet correctly, and formalizes the 
> previous usage of the cb field by the irda stack. The only issue I see 
> is that every single skbuff carries an additional 32 bytes which are not 

I really wanted to write a joke about existing practice of shrinking skb
as much as possible sucking bits out of existing fields, but your
proposal to add 32 bytes just kicked me out of the chair, my head landed
on the keyboard and result is quite miserable: kn cgjm ncfkjn chcmujhcm.

This 32 bytes will be unused by at least half of the packets (rx ones)
and on the machines, where irda is not used, it will be just a wasted
block. Moreover, head of the skb->data is also unused for irda in this
case...

What exactly should be carried in that area?

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

Re: [irda-users] [1/3] IRDA: Create new field tx_extra in skbuff

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Alex,

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:09:33AM -0500, Alex Villací­s Lasso wrote:
> This patch and the other two that follow fix the issue for me under  
> 2.6.28-rc3. Please comment on this, as I am messing around with the  
> skbuff structure, which potentially affects all network stacks.
Adding 32 bytes to _all_ skbs is a no-no.
This is an IrDA specific issue, and it has to be fixed in an IrDA specific
way. My patches work with my irda-usb and mcs7780 dongles. If they dont for
you, then we should dump the kernel stack when we're hitting the problem of
not having reserved enough headroom for the irda cb.
Evgeniy's proposal could also be another solution.


Cheers,
Samuel.

Re: [1/3] IRDA: Create new field tx_extra in skbuff

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 07:35:46PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov (zbr@ioremap.net) wrote:
> What exactly should be carried in that area?

It is struct irda_skb_cb, which contains qos and other bits of
intormation about how to transfer data, which are in turn obtained from
various _cb IRDA structures, which I tracked upto to for example
lsap_cb, which exists in the hash table. Do others also accessible via
similar mechanism? Can that data be stored on per-device basis like
ethernet checksum/offloading parameters (for example like LRO is done)?

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

Re: [1/3] IRDA: Create new field tx_extra in skbuff

[David Miller]

From: Alex Villací­s Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:09:33 -0500

> @@ -279,6 +279,14 @@
>  	 */
>  	char			cb[48];
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Additional space for layer-specific variables that need to
> +	 * survive past dev_queue_xmit(), which clobbers cb above.
> +	 * Intended for use by drivers that need additional layer-specific
> +	 * parameters in order to transmit a packet properly.
> +	 */
> +	char			tx_extra[32];
> +

This kind of bloat is absolutely not acceptable.

With IRDA as the only user of this thing, %99.99999 of systems out
there will just have this wasted space doing absolutely nothing.

Re: [1/3] IRDA: Create new field tx_extra in skbuff

[Samuel Ortiz]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 07:55:44PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 07:35:46PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov (zbr-i6C2adt8DTjR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org) wrote:
> > What exactly should be carried in that area?
> 
> It is struct irda_skb_cb, which contains qos and other bits of
> intormation about how to transfer data, which are in turn obtained from
> various _cb IRDA structures, which I tracked upto to for example
> lsap_cb, which exists in the hash table. Do others also accessible via
> similar mechanism? Can that data be stored on per-device basis like
> ethernet checksum/offloading parameters (for example like LRO is done)?
I thought about that solution, but the irda_skb_cb line field has to be kept
per skb. It is needed for ircomm LMP flow control, in the skb destructor. I
see that BT rfcomm does something similar, but uses the skbuff->sk as a
rfcomm_dev pointer. As far as I understand the skbuff structure, that doesnt
look like a reasonnable solution, as we cant assume the sk pointer won't be
altered down the line.

Cheers,
Samuel.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Re: [irda-users] [1/3] IRDA: Create new field tx_extra in skbuff

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

Hi Samuel.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 02:00:01AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz (samuel@sortiz.org) wrote:
> I thought about that solution, but the irda_skb_cb line field has to be kept
> per skb. It is needed for ircomm LMP flow control, in the skb destructor. I
> see that BT rfcomm does something similar, but uses the skbuff->sk as a
> rfcomm_dev pointer. As far as I understand the skbuff structure, that doesnt
> look like a reasonnable solution, as we cant assume the sk pointer won't be
> altered down the line.

It depends... If you own skb (when reference counter is 1), you can
owerwrite socket pointer with own data as long as destructor will also
be updated. You can try to clone skb and free old one to achieve this,
but it is not the fastest operation, althouhg I think both bt and irda
can afford that. Obviously in the first case you have to call old
destructor with old socket pointer also.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov