From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] hardware time stamping + igb example
 implementation
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20081112.141700.88446831.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <491B23FE.9000105@hartkopp.net>
	<491B2D03.1090700@cosmosbay.com>
	<491B3B49.7070402@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, oliver@hartkopp.net, patrick.ohly@intel.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, opurdila@ixiacom.com,
	shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@axxeo.de, john.ronciak@intel.com
To: ak@linux.intel.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55704
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751902AbYKLWRA (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:17:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <491B3B49.7070402@linux.intel.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:23:37 +0100

> Also I suspect that your percent numbers are wrong, depending on the
> workload.

I think that, considered globally, Eric's estimate is an over-estimate
in fact.