From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Karl Pickett <karl.pickett@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp_tw_recycle broken?
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 06:57:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081115055748.GY24654@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9be06770811142037v794cf4f8w7a82ab45c0f3820c@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:37:06PM -0500, Karl Pickett wrote:
> Hey. Developing a http proxy on fedora 9 (2.6.25) and running into a
> strange issue.
>
> Having the proxy set up and tear down 6000 tcp connections a second to
> the same test server ip and port,
> it quickly blows up (5 seconds) due to all 30000 ephemeral ports going
> to TIME_WAIT.
> setting tw_recycle=1 fixed the problem, and there are never more than
> a couple hundred ports in TIME_WAIT.
>
> BUT...
>
> Changing the load test to alternate between two test server ips, it
> blows up. Connect: can't assign requested address. (note I am not
> binding before hand, I tried
> and binding first to port 0 made no difference - it just blows up then
> during the bind).
>
> And there are ~28K ports in TIME_WAIT. For example:
>
> proxy_ip:30000 load_test_1:8080 TIME_WAIT
> proxy_ip:30000 load_test_2:8080 TIME_WAIT
> ...
> but most are not duplicates of the same local port.
>
>
> What. The. Heck.
>
> So short of rebuilding the kernel with time_wait as 1 second, is there
> any other way not to brick my proxy?
two things :
- set tcp_tw_reuse to 1 too.
- do a setsockopt(SO_REUSEADDR) before connect()
Using this, my proxy has no problem at 35K sess/s on 2.6.25. I'm not sure
if disabling either option above still works.
Hoping this helps,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-15 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-15 4:37 tcp_tw_recycle broken? Karl Pickett
2008-11-15 5:57 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2008-11-15 7:29 ` Karl Pickett
2008-11-15 13:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-15 15:47 ` Karl Pickett
2008-11-15 15:52 ` Willy Tarreau
[not found] ` <f9be06770811142325j79ca0831j7d5820716199811@mail.gmail.com>
2008-11-15 7:45 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081115055748.GY24654@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=karl.pickett@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).