From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev-2.6] jme: JMicron Gigabit Ethernet Driver Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:46:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20081121.004633.193696042.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20081120212045.27879d22@extreme> <20081120.213627.210066076.davem@davemloft.net> <20081120224542.10feb72d@extreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cooldavid@cooldavid.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ethanhsiao@jmicron.com, akeem@jmicron.com To: shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56112 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752482AbYKUIqd (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:46:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081120224542.10feb72d@extreme> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:45:42 -0800 > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:36:27 -0800 (PST) > David Miller wrote: > > > From: Stephen Hemminger > > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:20:45 -0800 > > > > > 6. Not using pci dma allocation which is more standard convention > > > > Using the generic DMA interfaces is actually preferred. There is > > no effective difference other than using a more generic interface. > > Ok, but this??? Yes, of course, all of those NAPI et al. abstraction macros have to go. I was only commenting about the DMA bits, the rest of your criticism was on target.