From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ptesarik@suse.cz
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, jsembera@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use TSO/GSO when there is urgent data
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:43:40 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081121.164340.67054948.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811211319.45515.ptesarik@suse.cz>
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:19:45 +0100
> This patch fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12014
>
> Since most (if not all) implementations of TSO and even the in-kernel
> software GSO do not update the urgent pointer when splitting a large
> segment, it is necessary to turn off TSO/GSO for all outgoing traffic
> with the URG pointer set.
>
> Looking at tcp_current_mss (and the preceding comment) I even think
> this was the original intention. However, this approach is insufficient,
> because TSO/GSO is turned off only for newly created frames, not for
> frames which were already pending at the arrival of a message with
> MSG_OOB set. These frames were created when TSO/GSO was enabled,
> so they may be large, and they will have the urgent pointer set
> in tcp_transmit_skb().
>
> With this patch, such large packets will be fragmented again before
> going to the transmit routine.
>
> As a side note, at least the following NICs are known to screw up
> the urgent pointer in the TCP header when doing TSO:
>
> Intel 82566MM (PCI ID 8086:1049)
> Intel 82566DC (PCI ID 8086:104b)
> Intel 82541GI (PCI ID 8086:1076)
> Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 (PCI ID 14e4:164c)
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Applied, thanks Petr.
BTW, your email client screwed up the patch by breaking up long lines,
for example:
> @@ -722,7 +722,8 @@ static void tcp_queue_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
> *skb)
And:
> @@ -1163,7 +1164,9 @@ static int tcp_init_tso_segs(struct sock *sk, struct
> sk_buff *skb,
I fixed it up this time, but I will not in the future.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-22 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 12:19 [PATCH] Do not use TSO/GSO when there is urgent data Petr Tesarik
2008-11-21 13:07 ` [PATCH] tcp: fix potential corner case issue in segmentation (Was: Re: [PATCH] Do not use TSO/GSO when there is urgent data) Ilpo Järvinen
2008-11-21 15:51 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-21 17:49 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-11-21 18:21 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-11-22 0:43 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081121.164340.67054948.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=jsembera@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).