* Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in the proto_register function
[not found] <20081121125628.11468.72009.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
@ 2008-11-21 14:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-11-22 0:45 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2008-11-21 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, netdev, linux-kernel
Please send networking patches to netdev@vger.kernel.org as well.
David,
Please apply.
- arnaldo
> Em Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:56:28PM +0000, Catalin Marinas escreveu:
If the slub allocator is used, kmem_cache_create() may merge two or more
kmem_cache's into one but the cache name pointer is not updated and
kmem_cache_name() is no longer guaranteed to return the pointer passed
to the former function. This patch stores the kmalloc'ed pointers in the
corresponding request_sock_ops and timewait_sock_ops structures.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/net/request_sock.h | 1 +
include/net/timewait_sock.h | 1 +
net/core/sock.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/request_sock.h b/include/net/request_sock.h
index cac811e..c719084 100644
--- a/include/net/request_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/request_sock.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct request_sock_ops {
int family;
int obj_size;
struct kmem_cache *slab;
+ char *slab_name;
int (*rtx_syn_ack)(struct sock *sk,
struct request_sock *req);
void (*send_ack)(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
diff --git a/include/net/timewait_sock.h b/include/net/timewait_sock.h
index 1e1ee32..97c3b14 100644
--- a/include/net/timewait_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/timewait_sock.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
struct timewait_sock_ops {
struct kmem_cache *twsk_slab;
+ char *twsk_slab_name;
unsigned int twsk_obj_size;
int (*twsk_unique)(struct sock *sk,
struct sock *sktw, void *twp);
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 341e394..edf7220 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -2035,9 +2035,6 @@ static inline void release_proto_idx(struct proto *prot)
int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab)
{
- char *request_sock_slab_name = NULL;
- char *timewait_sock_slab_name;
-
if (alloc_slab) {
prot->slab = kmem_cache_create(prot->name, prot->obj_size, 0,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
@@ -2051,12 +2048,12 @@ int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab)
if (prot->rsk_prot != NULL) {
static const char mask[] = "request_sock_%s";
- request_sock_slab_name = kmalloc(strlen(prot->name) + sizeof(mask) - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (request_sock_slab_name == NULL)
+ prot->rsk_prot->slab_name = kmalloc(strlen(prot->name) + sizeof(mask) - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (prot->rsk_prot->slab_name == NULL)
goto out_free_sock_slab;
- sprintf(request_sock_slab_name, mask, prot->name);
- prot->rsk_prot->slab = kmem_cache_create(request_sock_slab_name,
+ sprintf(prot->rsk_prot->slab_name, mask, prot->name);
+ prot->rsk_prot->slab = kmem_cache_create(prot->rsk_prot->slab_name,
prot->rsk_prot->obj_size, 0,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
@@ -2070,14 +2067,14 @@ int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab)
if (prot->twsk_prot != NULL) {
static const char mask[] = "tw_sock_%s";
- timewait_sock_slab_name = kmalloc(strlen(prot->name) + sizeof(mask) - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name = kmalloc(strlen(prot->name) + sizeof(mask) - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (timewait_sock_slab_name == NULL)
+ if (prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name == NULL)
goto out_free_request_sock_slab;
- sprintf(timewait_sock_slab_name, mask, prot->name);
+ sprintf(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name, mask, prot->name);
prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab =
- kmem_cache_create(timewait_sock_slab_name,
+ kmem_cache_create(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name,
prot->twsk_prot->twsk_obj_size,
0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
NULL);
@@ -2093,14 +2090,14 @@ int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab)
return 0;
out_free_timewait_sock_slab_name:
- kfree(timewait_sock_slab_name);
+ kfree(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name);
out_free_request_sock_slab:
if (prot->rsk_prot && prot->rsk_prot->slab) {
kmem_cache_destroy(prot->rsk_prot->slab);
prot->rsk_prot->slab = NULL;
}
out_free_request_sock_slab_name:
- kfree(request_sock_slab_name);
+ kfree(prot->rsk_prot->slab_name);
out_free_sock_slab:
kmem_cache_destroy(prot->slab);
prot->slab = NULL;
@@ -2123,18 +2120,14 @@ void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot)
}
if (prot->rsk_prot != NULL && prot->rsk_prot->slab != NULL) {
- const char *name = kmem_cache_name(prot->rsk_prot->slab);
-
kmem_cache_destroy(prot->rsk_prot->slab);
- kfree(name);
+ kfree(prot->rsk_prot->slab_name);
prot->rsk_prot->slab = NULL;
}
if (prot->twsk_prot != NULL && prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab != NULL) {
- const char *name = kmem_cache_name(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab);
-
kmem_cache_destroy(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab);
- kfree(name);
+ kfree(prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab_name);
prot->twsk_prot->twsk_slab = NULL;
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread