From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Guo-Fu Tseng" Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev-2.6] jme: JMicron Gigabit Ethernet Driver Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:22:14 +0800 Message-ID: <20081121161840.M52663@cooldavid.org> References: <20081120212045.27879d22@extreme> <20081120.213627.210066076.davem@davemloft.net> <20081120224542.10feb72d@extreme> <20081121.004633.193696042.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: cooldavid@cooldavid.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: akeem@jmicron.com, ethanhsiao@jmicron.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller , shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from cooldavid.org ([220.133.139.86]:51453 "EHLO cooldavid.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754017AbYKUQe1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:34:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081121.004633.193696042.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:46:33 -0800 (PST), David Miller wrote > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:45:42 -0800 > > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:36:27 -0800 (PST) > > David Miller wrote: > > > > > From: Stephen Hemminger > > > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:20:45 -0800 > > > > > > > 6. Not using pci dma allocation which is more standard convention > > > > > > Using the generic DMA interfaces is actually preferred. There is > > > no effective difference other than using a more generic interface. > > > > Ok, but this??? > > Yes, of course, all of those NAPI et al. abstraction macros have > to go. > > I was only commenting about the DMA bits, the rest of your > criticism was on target. Thank you for point those out. This is my first driver, so I still have many things to learn. I'll work on it. Any suggestion or help is very welcome! Guo-Fu Tseng