netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@bigtelecom.ru>,
	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: gen_estimator: Fix gen_kill_estimator() lookups
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:37:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081124133724.GC16755@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227532725.22481.14.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:18:45AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 12:04 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > gen_kill_estimator() linear lists lookups are very slow, and e.g. while
> > deleting a large number of HTB classes soft lockups were reported. Here
> > is another try to fix this problem: this time internally, with rbtree,
> > so similarly to Jamal's hashing idea IIRC. (Looking for next hits could
> > be still optimized, but it's really fast as it is.)
> 
> Certainly a big improvement. Compared to hashing i suggested:
> the deletion speed is probably equal or better than using a hash.
> I think a hash would have performed better in the case of addition
> than the rb tree; but you primarily concerned about deletion, so this
> good.

I first thought about a hash, but alas Patrick's solution is sched
only... Anyway, I din't see too much overhead in memory use, and no
diffrence in addition times (without batching).

> 
> Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>
> 

Thanks,
Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-24 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-24 12:04 [PATCH] net: gen_estimator: Fix gen_kill_estimator() lookups Jarek Poplawski
2008-11-24 13:18 ` jamal
2008-11-24 13:37   ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-11-24 15:00     ` jamal
2008-11-25  7:52       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-11-24 23:49     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081124133724.GC16755@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slavon@bigtelecom.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).