From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:39:42 -0500 Message-ID: <20081127093942.GA13860@infradead.org> References: <20081121083044.GL16242@elte.hu> <49267694.1030506@cosmosbay.com> <20081121.010508.40225532.davem@davemloft.net> <4926AEDB.10007@cosmosbay.com> <4926D022.5060008@cosmosbay.com> <20081121152148.GA20388@elte.hu> <4926D39D.9050603@cosmosbay.com> <20081121153453.GA23713@elte.hu> <492DDB6A.8090806@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ingo Molnar , David Miller , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Netdev List , Christoph Lameter , Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:44799 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751334AbYK0Jjt (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:39:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <492DDB6A.8090806@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: As I told you before, you absolutely must include the fsdevel list and the VFS maintainer for a patchset like this.