From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] fs: Introduce a per_cpu nr_dentry Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:41:56 -0500 Message-ID: <20081127094156.GB13860@infradead.org> References: <20081121083044.GL16242@elte.hu> <49267694.1030506@cosmosbay.com> <20081121.010508.40225532.davem@davemloft.net> <4926AEDB.10007@cosmosbay.com> <4926D022.5060008@cosmosbay.com> <20081121152148.GA20388@elte.hu> <4926D39D.9050603@cosmosbay.com> <20081121153453.GA23713@elte.hu> <492DDC0B.8060804@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ingo Molnar , David Miller , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Netdev List , Christoph Lameter , Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <492DDC0B.8060804-fPLkHRcR87vqlBn2x/YWAg@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Looks good modulo the exact version of the for_each_cpu loops that the experts in that area can help with. Same for the per_cpu nr_inodes patch.