netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "m m" <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netlink - notify when the socket gets closed
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:56:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081205195624.95ea1866.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35476bd20812050017y70c3c729v450cdc3d0c1188de@mail.gmail.com>

(cc netdev@vger.kernel.org)

On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:17:51 +0100 "m m" <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm using netlink in my module. Based on the communication,
> this module dynamically creates some internal structure, which
> needs to be destroyed when the user level socket is closed (or
> the application dies).
> 
> I found I could use the netlink_register_notifier function to register
> NETLINK_URELEASE callback during the netlink_release function.
> But since my module uses the multicast netlink socket communication,
> it wont be called:
> 
> static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
> {
>         ...
> 
>         if (nlk->pid && !nlk->subscriptions) {
>                 struct netlink_notify n = {
>                                                 .net = sock_net(sk),
>                                                 .protocol = sk->sk_protocol,
>                                                 .pid = nlk->pid,
>                                           };
>                 atomic_notifier_call_chain(&netlink_chain,
>                                 NETLINK_URELEASE, &n);
>         }
>         ...
> 
> Whats the reason this callback is not called for multicast sockets?
> 
> To workaround it I created simple misc device which the user application
> opens before creating the netlink socket. This way I get some callbacks
> inside the module when the application dies, at least.. pretty ugly :)
> 
> Is there a netlink mechanism to be notified when the netlink socket is
> closed on the user level side? (when using multicast communication)
> 
> Or is there any other design I could use, since I think I'm not alone in
> using internal module data which needs to be removed once the application dies.


       reply	other threads:[~2008-12-06  3:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <35476bd20812050017y70c3c729v450cdc3d0c1188de@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-06  3:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-12-06 14:58   ` netlink - notify when the socket gets closed Patrick McHardy
2008-12-06 18:10     ` m m
2008-12-07 16:04       ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081205195624.95ea1866.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).