From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Patch] Micrel KS8695 intergrated ethernet driver Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:05:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20081209.010529.57138453.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1228499870.3520.66.camel@achroite> <1228734318.19000.84.camel@petitemort> <20081209085739.GA30586@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dsilvers@simtec.co.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: hch@infradead.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:54890 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751466AbYLIJF2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 04:05:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081209085739.GA30586@infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 03:57:39 -0500 > On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:05:18AM +0000, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > > > > + mapping = dma_map_single(ksp->dev, skb->data, > > > > + MAX_RXBUF_SIZE, > > > > + DMA_FROM_DEVICE); > > > I take it that dma_map_single() can never fail on ARM? > > > > No it can't. It essentially boils down to some pointer arithmetic on > > this platform. > > You should check for errors anyway. The driver might be ported to an > architecture where it can fail (e.g. the SOC block gets reused), ARM > variants may come up where it can fail, or people might use the driver > as an example for their own new driver. Agreed.