netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
Cc: zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: bad unlock balance detected! e1000e
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:08:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081209150801.2aa76ac6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081209110337.GJ4864@gambetta>

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:03:37 +0100
Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu> wrote:

> It some error checking is missing in e1000e: debug contention on NVM
> SWFLAG
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:24:09PM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > During occasional scan of message log - I've found out this BUG which
> > happened on Dec3 with the -rc7 from that day.
> > (So if it's now fixed in current git feel free to ignore :))
> > 
> > My machine T61 - C2D, 2GB, 64bit kernel - message appeared during
> > shutdown and was actually not noticed by me...
> > 
> > 
> > NetworkManager: <WARN>  nm_signal_handler(): Caught signal 15,
> > shutting down normally.
> > NetworkManager: <info>  (eth0): now unmanaged
> > NetworkManager: <info>  (eth0): device state change: 3 -> 1
> > NetworkManager: <info>  (eth0): cleaning up...
> > NetworkManager: <info>  (eth0): taking down device.
> > 
> > =====================================
> > [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
> > -------------------------------------

(top-posting repaired.  Please don't do that!!!).

> Hello Zdenek,
> 
> This could be due to 717d438d1fde94decef874b9808379d1f4523453
>     "e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG"
> Error handling is missing from e1000_reset_hw_ich8lan so it may happen
> that we don't acquire the nvm_mutex if the card times out.
> 
> Adding Thomas to CC.

yup.  2.6.27 needs fixing also.

Like this?

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

=====================================
[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
-------------------------------------

A regression added by 717d438d1fde94decef874b9808379d1f4523453 ("e1000e:
debug contention on NVM SWFLAG").

Reported-by: "Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c~drivers-net-e1000e-ich8lanc-fix-locking drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c~drivers-net-e1000e-ich8lanc-fix-locking
+++ a/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
@@ -400,6 +400,7 @@ static s32 e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan(
 {
 	u32 extcnf_ctrl;
 	u32 timeout = PHY_CFG_TIMEOUT;
+	s32 ret = 0;
 
 	might_sleep();
 
@@ -427,11 +428,11 @@ static s32 e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan(
 		extcnf_ctrl &= ~E1000_EXTCNF_CTRL_SWFLAG;
 		ew32(EXTCNF_CTRL, extcnf_ctrl);
 		nvm_owner = -1;
-		mutex_unlock(&nvm_mutex);
-		return -E1000_ERR_CONFIG;
+		ret = -E1000_ERR_CONFIG;
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&nvm_mutex);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
_


       reply	other threads:[~2008-12-09 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <c4e36d110812080324y68c0e453qcb68a040da7ac9a2@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20081209110337.GJ4864@gambetta>
2008-12-09 23:08   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-12-09 23:43     ` BUG: bad unlock balance detected! e1000e Frederik Deweerdt
2008-12-09 23:56       ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-11  0:37         ` Jeff Kirsher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081209150801.2aa76ac6.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).