From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Hohnstaedt Subject: Re: qmgr for ixp4xx Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:44:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20081209164420.GY16037@mail3.prorata.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Miguel ?ngel ?lvarez , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Halasa Return-path: Received: from mail3.prorata.de ([62.145.31.200]:46617 "EHLO mail3.prorata.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752713AbYLIQvI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:51:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:29:36PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > "Miguel ?ngel ?lvarez" writes: > > > I will check for the 64-queue support patch (thanks Karl). However, if > > I am not sure they are required. I mean... > > - HSS0 uses queues 12-22. > > - HSS1 uses queues 0-10. > > - That leaves us 10 queues free, doesn't it? Couldn't we use queue 11 > > for eth txreadyq, 23-26 for HSS0 txreadyq, 27-30 for HSS1 txreadyq and > > 31 for crypto code (which I do not know?) > > Ethernet needs 3 queues per port + 1 (465 CPUs can have 3 Ethernet > ports), the crypto code probably needs several ones. Crypto needs 2 queues: 29 and 30. The numbers are fixed in the microcode, I think. Christian