From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop scaring users with "treason uncloaked!" Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:08:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20081218.160815.106790562.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1229638581.3726.546.camel@calx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:37324 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751629AbYLSAIO convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:08:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: "Ilpo J=E4rvinen" Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:33:46 +0200 (EET) > On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Matt Mackall wrote: >=20 > > These debug messages are uninformative and extremely alarming. Rath= er > > than reporting a peer as a treacherous attacker, report it more > > correctly as simply broken.=20 >=20 > Last time (well, ignoring some report on ancient vendor kernel) I've = seen=20 > this to trigger it wasn't the fault of the peer but ours (we sent pas= t the=20 > advertized window and window ended up being shrunk to zero). I agree = that=20 > the message as-is is not very good but your change is not very good=20 > either. ... > This won't apply to net-next on which you should base anything new (a= nd=20 > net related). Agreed.