From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch 07/10] 802.3ad: use standard ethhdr instead of ad_header Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:41:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20081226.134159.167533997.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20081223220101.747816175@jonathan.eitzenberger.org> <20081223220559.192000322@jonathan.eitzenberger.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: holger@eitzenberger.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55957 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752880AbYLZVl4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:41:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081223220559.192000322@jonathan.eitzenberger.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Holger Eitzenberger Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:01:08 +0100 > 802.3ad has its own ethhdr-like structure in the form of an ad_header, > which is at the start of both the LACPDU and marker PDU. Both are > the same from the struct values, both are packed as well. > > It's therefore perfectly fine to replace the ad_header by the ethhdr > and to remove its definition. > > Signed-off-by: Holger Eitzenberger Applied.