From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
emil.s.tantilov@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com,
alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:04:38 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081229.230438.90548187.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081230065650.GD30975@elte.hu>
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:56:50 +0100
>
> * David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:05:36 +0100
> >
> > > One small nit: could you please add the Reported-by line for Jeff Kirscher
> > > who reported the problem originally:
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> >
> > I'll make sure to add that to the commit message after
> > you successfully test Herbert's patch.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> early indications are good: after about 15 random bootup tests the lockdep
> warning has not triggered. (it would trigger on every 2nd kernel before
> that - there's a 66% chance for lockdep to be enabled in my randconfig
> tests)
Sounds good. I'll toss this into my net-2.6 tree, with Jeff's
reported-by and your Tested-by, and send this off to Linus
tonight.
Thanks everyone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-30 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-25 10:25 unsafe locks seen with netperf on net-2.6.29 tree Jeff Kirsher
2008-12-25 11:26 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-26 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-27 19:38 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2008-12-27 20:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-28 0:54 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2008-12-29 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-29 10:07 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-29 10:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:31 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:37 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 11:49 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 11:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:44 ` [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 3:58 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-30 6:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 6:39 ` David Miller
2008-12-30 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 7:04 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-12-30 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:49 ` unsafe locks seen with netperf on net-2.6.29 tree Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 12:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081229.230438.90548187.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).