Re: [RFC] cpualloc: improvements to per-cpu allocation

Christoph Lameter
2009-01-01T01:04:12Z

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:

> I don't think it's a problem. You still can't use them directly (this
> wording was not meant to imply that), but you can now hand their addresses
> to per_cpu_ptr() etc. So zero-based x86-64 should Just Work.

Ok so this is going to be merged for 2.6.29? Its a good cleanup and a step
forward to our goals.