From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware() Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:34:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090104.213402.12464178.davem@davemloft.net> References: <9929d2390812301433pae01ea4g5bfdef6d4d4c7a9c@mail.gmail.com> <20090104.160611.252248503.davem@davemloft.net> <9929d2390901041820h4cf51e2h3612108c516b6869@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jaswinder@infradead.org, linux.nics@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9929d2390901041820h4cf51e2h3612108c516b6869@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: "Jeff Kirsher" Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:20:24 -0800 > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: "Jeff Kirsher" > > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:33:36 -0800 > > > >> Please hold off on committing, until we have had ample time to do some > >> regression testing. While this patch may have been in linux-next, > >> this is the first we have seen of it. > >> > >> I am concerned that IPMI traffic will be adversely affected by this patch. > > > > Status please? > > -- > > The only testing left to do is to make sure that ICH devices still > work and to make sure the IPMI traffic is not affected by this patch. > All other testing looks good. I am sorry that I have been slow to > give status, the holiday's have put a strain on available resources. Ok, thanks for the update.