From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [BUG #12364] Re: HTB - very bad precision? HFSC works fine! 2.6.28 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:30:30 +0000 Message-ID: <20090109103030.GI4605@ff.dom.local> References: <1935.87.196.72.187.1231371721.squirrel@webmail.decimal.pt> <200901082041.58597.denys@visp.net.lb> <1059.87.196.62.168.1231451164.squirrel@webmail.decimal.pt> <200901082357.13396.denys@visp.net.lb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jorge Bastos , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: Denys Fedoryschenko Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f17.google.com ([209.85.219.17]:44752 "EHLO mail-ew0-f17.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752104AbZAIKah (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:30:37 -0500 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so10122185ewy.13 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:30:35 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901082357.13396.denys@visp.net.lb> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:57:13PM +0200, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote: > Can 100HZ be issue? Generally, if you need precise scheduling HZ=1000 should be used if higher cpu usage isn't a problem. Jarek P.