From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH - REPOST] asix.c - Add support for AX88772A devices - Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:22:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090115.082253.154478845.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1231949520.4105.97.camel@dhollis-lnx> <1231952036.3010.21.camel@achroite> <1232024974.4105.251.camel@dhollis-lnx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dhollis@davehollis.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42408 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756745AbZAOQWw (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:22:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1232024974.4105.251.camel@dhollis-lnx> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: David Hollis Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:09:34 -0500 > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 16:53 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > @@ -1451,6 +1588,10 @@ static const struct usb_device_id produc > > > // Cables-to-Go USB Ethernet Adapter > > > USB_DEVICE(0x0b95, 0x772a), > > > .driver_info = (unsigned long) &ax88772_info, > > > +}, { > > > + // ASIX AX88772A > > > + USB_DEVICE(0x0b95, 0x772a), > > > + .driver_info = (unsigned long) &ax88772a_info, > > > > This is matching the same id as the entry above, so how will it ever be > > used? Do the bind operations distinguish them somehow? > > > > Ugh! I didn't notice that either. Unfortunately, I don't have this new > device to be able to test with so I have to rely on the vendors > contribution. I would presume that the Cables-to-Go device needs to be > using ax88772a_info and in the current state, it isn't going to. I'll > check with the contributor for an assist on that. Grrr, I just noticed this and I'm ripping this patch out of my tree. Sigh.