From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: sfc: Replace LRO with GRO Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:27:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090119.152717.147996116.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1232376006.3004.19.camel@achroite> <20090119.132929.108799868.davem@davemloft.net> <1232403167.5539.1.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au To: harvey.harrison@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42504 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753247AbZASX1P (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:27:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1232403167.5539.1.camel@brick> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Harvey Harrison Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:12:47 -0800 > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 13:29 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Ben Hutchings > > > > > > Please could you push this and other GRO changes for .30 to > > > net-next-2.6? > > > > All of Herbert's bug fixes are going into net-2.6, and that's > > where they will stay. > > > > I haven't published my net-next-2.6 tree at all, because > > Stephen Rothwell hasn't stated that such content is > > OK yet for his -next tree. > > I thought Stephen had stated that anytime _after_ -rc1 was released was > OK for new material destined for the next release. > > If you're waiting for an explicit OK, I don't think it will forthcoming. I, unlike some others, value Stephen Rothwell's sanity. So I will ask explicitly before potentially spoiling his afternoon :-)