From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] am79c961a: fix spin_lock usage Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:56:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090122.145615.235726630.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1232663382-10503-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: 12o3l@tiscali.nl, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, srostedt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60170 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758776AbZAVW4N convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:56:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1232663382-10503-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:29:42 +0100 > spin_lock functions take a pointer to the lock, not the lock itself. > This error was noticed by compiling ebsa110_defconfig for linux-rt wh= ere > the locking functions obviously are more picky about their arguments. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig Russell, this fix is real. Want me to take it or will you? BTW, I took linux-arm-kernel out of the CC because all of my postings there bounce simply because I lack reverse DNS :-/