From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] am79c961a: fix spin_lock usage Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:16:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090122.161659.261404462.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1232663382-10503-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20090122.145615.235726630.davem@davemloft.net> <20090122234036.GA23484@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, srostedt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51791 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755449AbZAWAQ5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:16:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090122234036.GA23484@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Russell King Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:40:36 +0000 > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:56:15PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:29:42 +0100 > >=20 > > > spin_lock functions take a pointer to the lock, not the lock itse= lf. > > > This error was noticed by compiling ebsa110_defconfig for linux-r= t where > > > the locking functions obviously are more picky about their argume= nts. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > >=20 > > Russell, this fix is real. Want me to take it or will you? >=20 > I'll take it. Great. > > BTW, I took linux-arm-kernel out of the CC because all of my postin= gs > > there bounce simply because I lack reverse DNS :-/ >=20 > No need; in theory I've whitelisted your IP. However, I've dropped > 12o3l@tiscali.nl from the CC because that address bounces. Thanks, I noticed him bounce too.