From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH] am79c961a: fix spin_lock usage Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:40:36 +0000 Message-ID: <20090122234036.GA23484@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1232663382-10503-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20090122.145615.235726630.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, srostedt@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:46358 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755468AbZAVXlR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:41:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090122.145615.235726630.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:56:15PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:29:42 +0100 >=20 > > spin_lock functions take a pointer to the lock, not the lock itself= =2E > > This error was noticed by compiling ebsa110_defconfig for linux-rt = where > > the locking functions obviously are more picky about their argument= s. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig >=20 > Russell, this fix is real. Want me to take it or will you? I'll take it. > BTW, I took linux-arm-kernel out of the CC because all of my postings > there bounce simply because I lack reverse DNS :-/ No need; in theory I've whitelisted your IP. However, I've dropped 12o3l@tiscali.nl from the CC because that address bounces. --=20 Russell King