From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add tracepoints to socket api Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:20:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090127.092017.40699485.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090126195930.GA28208@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20090127171857.GB14429@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: nhorman@tuxdriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: hch@infradead.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42697 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753255AbZA0RUU (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:20:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090127171857.GB14429@infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:18:57 -0500 > Do we now have lttng in linux-next? Otherwise these trace point would > be useless there without more patching. We're merging this stuff to solve the chicken and egg problem wherein the lttng tree merge is basically stalled. If the individual subsystem annotations go in, the hope is that they'll have less to merge and thus it's more likely to actually happen.