From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add tracepoints to socket api Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:47:04 -0500 Message-ID: <20090127184704.GA26403@infradead.org> References: <20090127171857.GB14429@infradead.org> <20090127.092017.40699485.davem@davemloft.net> <20090127172323.GA7635@infradead.org> <20090127.102141.99756103.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: hch@infradead.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:46747 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755187AbZA0SrG (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:47:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090127.102141.99756103.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:21:41AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > The block layer already merged trace annotations. I therefore see no > harm in merging the net bits. The block layer also has a consumer for them (blktrace) and soon a second one (the ftrace plugin)