From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Matt Carlson" <mcarlson@broadcom.com>
Cc: "Parag Warudkar" <parag.lkml@gmail.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:10:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901300110.56533.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090129234127.GA14023@xw6200.broadcom.net>
On Friday 30 January 2009, Matt Carlson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:03:37PM -0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 January 2009, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Matt Carlson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can you apply the following test patch and see if it helps? The patch
> > > > does two things. First, it enables a bit which should restore firmware
> > > > communication. If that fixes the problem, then let me know and I'll
> > > > spin a proper patch.
> > > >
> > > > In the event that it doesn't work, the patch goes on to test the memory
> > > > mapping by simply printing the register value at offset 0x0. The value
> > > > should be the device's vendor ID and device ID. Please post the
> > > > results so that I can verify it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tg3.c b/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > > > index 8b3f846..39fce42 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > > > @@ -7227,6 +7227,11 @@ static int tg3_init_hw(struct tg3 *tp, int reset_phy)
> > > > {
> > > > tg3_switch_clocks(tp);
> > > >
> > > > + printk( KERN_NOTICE "%s: Reg value at offset 0x0 is 0x%x\n",
> > > > + tp->dev->name, tr32(0x0) );
> > > > +
> > > > + tw32(MEMARB_MODE, tr32(MEMARB_MODE) | MEMARB_MODE_ENABLE);
> > > > +
> > > > tw32(TG3PCI_MEM_WIN_BASE_ADDR, 0);
> > > >
> > > > return tg3_reset_hw(tp, reset_phy);
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Matt,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch. It didn't help with resume - but below is the
> > > output after patching, let me know if you need more details.
> >
> > [--snip--]
> >
> > In the meantime I tried to rework tg3 suspend/resume so that it uses the new
> > PCI core capability of handling the PCI-specific parts of both operations.
> >
> > The patch is appended, please see if it makes any difference.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/net/tg3.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > @@ -13330,18 +13330,13 @@ static void __devexit tg3_remove_one(str
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static int tg3_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > +
> > +static int tg3_suspend(struct device *device)
> > {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
> > struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > struct tg3 *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
> > - pci_power_t target_state;
> > - int err;
> > -
> > - /* PCI register 4 needs to be saved whether netif_running() or not.
> > - * MSI address and data need to be saved if using MSI and
> > - * netif_running().
> > - */
> > - pci_save_state(pdev);
> >
> > if (!netif_running(dev))
> > return 0;
> > @@ -13363,50 +13358,19 @@ static int tg3_suspend(struct pci_dev *p
> > tp->tg3_flags &= ~TG3_FLAG_INIT_COMPLETE;
> > tg3_full_unlock(tp);
> >
> > - target_state = pdev->pm_cap ? pci_target_state(pdev) : PCI_D3hot;
> > -
> > - err = tg3_set_power_state(tp, target_state);
>
> tg3_set_power_state() does way more than configuring the power
> management registers to the desired state though. It sets up WOL,
> configures the chip clocks, etc. This isn't safe to remove.
OK, so it requires more care to be taken.
However, suspend-resume seems to work on my test box with this patch applied,
although admittedly I haven't tested WoL.
I still am interested if it makes any difference for Parag.
> > - if (err) {
> > - int err2;
> > -
> > - tg3_full_lock(tp, 0);
> > -
> > - tp->tg3_flags |= TG3_FLAG_INIT_COMPLETE;
> > - err2 = tg3_restart_hw(tp, 1);
> > - if (err2)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > - tp->timer.expires = jiffies + tp->timer_offset;
> > - add_timer(&tp->timer);
> > -
> > - netif_device_attach(dev);
> > - tg3_netif_start(tp);
> > -
> > -out:
> > - tg3_full_unlock(tp);
> > -
> > - if (!err2)
> > - tg3_phy_start(tp);
> > - }
> > -
> > - return err;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int tg3_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +static int tg3_resume(struct device *device)
> > {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
> > struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > struct tg3 *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
> > int err;
> >
> > - pci_restore_state(tp->pdev);
> > -
> > if (!netif_running(dev))
> > return 0;
> >
> > - err = tg3_set_power_state(tp, PCI_D0);
>
> ...and here tg3_set_power_state() restores our ability to communicate
> with the chip via MMIO.
If that were the case, it wouldn't work after a resume with the patch applied.
Still, it does work, at least with the chip I have here.
> Also, after restoring the power state to D0, the chip is switched back from
> VAux to VMain.
Are you sure this actually happens? On my box the chip is in D0 already
when the BIOS returns control to the kernel.
> This isn't safe either.
Anyway, I'd very much prefer to separate the generic PCI operations from the
device-specific code.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-30 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 0:14 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume Parag Warudkar
2009-01-29 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 1:49 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-29 2:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 2:19 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-29 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-29 18:42 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-29 22:06 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-29 22:22 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-29 22:35 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-29 23:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-30 18:40 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-30 22:50 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-30 23:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 23:45 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-30 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 23:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 0:28 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-31 0:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 0:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-31 0:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 1:21 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-31 1:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 1:42 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-02-03 9:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 21:27 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-02-03 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 0:38 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-02-04 0:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-07 3:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-07 18:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-01-31 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 1:54 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-31 2:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 2:40 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-31 18:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 2:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 1:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 21:42 ` What should PCI core do during suspend-resume? (was: Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 23:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 23:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 23:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 0:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-01 1:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 1:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 1:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 1:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-07 9:21 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-31 21:47 ` 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 23:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 0:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-01 0:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 0:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-01 0:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-07 3:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-07 3:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-29 23:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-29 23:41 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-30 0:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-01-30 22:31 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-30 22:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-30 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 23:13 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-30 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-30 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 0:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 0:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901300110.56533.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).