From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Carlson <mcarlson@broadcom.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:59:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901310059.17746.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0901301826490.5027@parag-desktop>
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> >
> > Because we obviously have two people who say that their tg3 suspend/resume
> > works fine, so the tg3 driver is obviously not _totally_ broken. So I'm
> > wondering if there is something funny in between the CPU and the tg3, like
> > a hotplug bridge that needs magic to wake up properly.
> >
> > Because clearly the PCI config space addresses are working fine, but the
> > thing is, while PCI config space accesses are routed by the device number
> > (and the bridges notion of secondary bridging), the PCI memory space
> > routing is based on address. So a PCI bridge can easily get one right (in
> > fact, it's really hard to get config space accesses wrong without the
> > bridges being _totally_ screwed up), while not routing the other at all.
> >
> > So just do that "lspci -vvxxx" for the whole box, before and after, and
> > send us the "before" and the "diff -u before after" thing, and maybe that
> > shows something interesting. Because some bridge chip being confused would
> > also explain why a total re-init of the whole tg3 chip by a driver unload
> > and reload doesn't seem to help.
>
> Totally worth having this problem from a "getting an opportunity to
> understand" standpoint. This confirms my long standing suspicion that bugs
> in Linux kernel are merely a handiwork of few clever people to get more
> people to understand and contribute :)
>
> Any how here is the pre-suspend lspci -vvxxx output followed by diff -u -
>
[--snip--]
I think this is what we're looking for:
> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
> f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 0f 01 00 00 00 00 00
>
> 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev 09)
> - Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx+
> + Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx+
> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
> Bus: primary=00, secondary=0e, subordinate=0e, sec-latency=0
and the PCIe port driver may be at fault.
Can you try to remove the pci_save_state(dev) from pcie_port_suspend_late()
and see if that helps?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-31 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 0:14 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume Parag Warudkar
2009-01-29 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 1:49 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-29 2:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 2:19 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-29 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-29 18:42 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-29 22:06 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-29 22:22 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-29 22:35 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-29 23:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-30 18:40 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-30 22:50 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-30 23:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 23:45 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-30 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 23:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-01-31 0:28 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-31 0:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 0:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-31 0:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 1:21 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-31 1:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 1:42 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-02-03 9:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 21:27 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-02-03 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 0:38 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-02-04 0:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-07 3:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-07 18:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-01-31 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 1:54 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-31 2:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 2:40 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-31 18:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 2:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 1:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 21:42 ` What should PCI core do during suspend-resume? (was: Re: 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 23:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 23:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 23:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 0:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-01 1:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 1:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 1:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 1:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-07 9:21 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-31 21:47 ` 2.6.29-rc3: tg3 dead after resume Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 23:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 0:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-01 0:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-01 0:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-01 0:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-07 3:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-07 3:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-29 23:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-29 23:41 ` Matt Carlson
2009-01-30 0:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-30 22:31 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-30 22:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-30 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 23:13 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-01-30 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-30 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 0:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-31 0:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901310059.17746.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).