From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, gospo@redhat.com,
alexander.h.duyck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 01/26] igb: optomize/refactor receive path
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:46:19 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090207.024619.235083759.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090207091504.15697.26667.stgit@lost.foo-projects.org>
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:15:04 -0800
> While cleaning up the skb_over panic with small frames I found there was
> room for improvement in the ordering of operations within the rx receive
> flow. These changes will place the prefetch for the next descriptor to a
> point earlier in the rx path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
"Optomize"? Is that something like labotomize? :-)
Anyways, I fixed up that typo and applied all 26 patches
to net-next-2.6
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-07 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-07 9:15 [net-next PATCH 01/26] igb: optomize/refactor receive path Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:15 ` [net-next PATCH 02/26] igb: move setting of buffsz out of repeated path in alloc_rx_buffers Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:15 ` [net-next PATCH 03/26] igb: move initialization of number of queues into set_interrupt_capability Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:16 ` [net-next PATCH 04/26] igb: remove check for needing an io port Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:16 ` [net-next PATCH 05/26] igb: add link check function Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:16 ` [net-next PATCH 06/26] igb: make dev_spec a union and remove dynamic allocation Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:17 ` [net-next PATCH 07/26] igb: read address from RAH/RAL instead of from EEPROM Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:17 ` [net-next PATCH 08/26] igb: rename phy ops Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:17 ` [net-next PATCH 09/26] igb: rename nvm ops Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:18 ` [net-next PATCH 10/26] igb: remove unused rx_hdr_split statistic Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:18 ` [net-next PATCH 11/26] igb: update feature flags supported in ethtool Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:18 ` [net-next PATCH 12/26] igb: update testing done by ethtool Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:19 ` [net-next PATCH 13/26] igb: add counter for dma out of sync errors Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:19 ` [net-next PATCH 14/26] igb: cleanup igb_netpoll to be more friendly with napi & GRO Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:19 ` [net-next PATCH 15/26] igb: remove redundant timer updates and cleanup watchdog_task Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:20 ` [net-next PATCH 16/26] igb: rename igb_update_mc_addr_list_82575 to not include the 82575 Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:20 ` [net-next PATCH 17/26] igb: remove unnecessary adapter->hw calls when just hw-> will do Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:20 ` [net-next PATCH 18/26] igb: don't read eicr when responding to legacy interrupts Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:21 ` [net-next PATCH 19/26] igb: move get_hw_control within igb_resume Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:21 ` [net-next PATCH 20/26] igb: change pba size determination from if to switch statement Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:21 ` [net-next PATCH 21/26] igb: remove disable_av variable from mac_info struct Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:22 ` [net-next PATCH 22/26] igb: remove redundant count set and err_hw_init Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:22 ` [net-next PATCH 23/26] igb: update stats before doing reset in igb_down Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:22 ` [net-next PATCH 24/26] igb: fix two minor items found during code review Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:23 ` [net-next PATCH 25/26] igb: update version number and copyright dates Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 9:23 ` [net-next PATCH 26/26] igb: remove dead code in transmit routine Jeff Kirsher
2009-02-07 10:46 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090207.024619.235083759.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).