From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: copyless virtio net thoughts? Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:01:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090207.190156.209878491.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090206091904.GA6645@gondor.apana.org.au> <498C4F6C.4070402@redhat.com> <200902071256.07513.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: avi@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: arnd@arndb.de Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200902071256.07513.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:56:06 +0100 > Having the load spread evenly over all guests sounds like a much rarer > use case. Totally agreed.