netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] net: don't use in_atomic() in gfp_any()
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:48:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090211134842.7fa73b6d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902120638.BFG12928.FFMOHJOVtOQLFS@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:38:55 +0900
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Solve both these problems by switching to in_interrupt().  Now, if someone
> > runs a gfp_any() allocation from inside spinlock we will get the warning
> > if CONFIG_PREEMPT=y.
> 
> >  static inline gfp_t gfp_any(void)
> >  {
> > -	return in_atomic() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL;
> > +	return in_softirq() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL;
> >  }
> sed -i -e 's/in_softirq/in_interrupt/' ?

heh, good question.

I did all my testing with in_softirq() - the changelog didn't catch up.



Is gfp_any() supposed to be usable from hardirq context?

If so, we should use in_interrupt().

If not, we should use in_softirq(), and we'll then get might_sleep()
warnings if anyone uses gfp_any() from hard irq context.





  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-11 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-11 21:27 [patch 1/2] net: don't use in_atomic() in gfp_any() akpm
2009-02-11 21:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2009-02-11 21:48   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-11 22:02     ` David Miller
2009-02-11 21:49   ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-13  0:43 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090211134842.7fa73b6d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).