From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] net: don't use in_atomic() in gfp_any()
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:49:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090211134942.a800067e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902120638.BFG12928.FFMOHJOVtOQLFS@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Resend with cc's restored. Please DO NOT edit the Cc: line :(
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:38:55 +0900
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Solve both these problems by switching to in_interrupt(). Now, if someone
> > runs a gfp_any() allocation from inside spinlock we will get the warning
> > if CONFIG_PREEMPT=y.
>
> > static inline gfp_t gfp_any(void)
> > {
> > - return in_atomic() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL;
> > + return in_softirq() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL;
> > }
> sed -i -e 's/in_softirq/in_interrupt/' ?
heh, good question.
I did all my testing with in_softirq() - the changelog didn't catch up.
Is gfp_any() supposed to be usable from hardirq context?
If so, we should use in_interrupt().
If not, we should use in_softirq(), and we'll then get might_sleep()
warnings if anyone uses gfp_any() from hard irq context.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-11 21:27 [patch 1/2] net: don't use in_atomic() in gfp_any() akpm
2009-02-11 21:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2009-02-11 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-11 22:02 ` David Miller
2009-02-11 21:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-13 0:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090211134942.a800067e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).