From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41]bnx2x: enhancements and clean up for net-next Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:36:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090215.233609.86653297.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1234463763.1863.131.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yanivr@broadcom.com, harvey.harrison@gmail.com To: eilong@broadcom.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40363 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751964AbZBPHgZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:36:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1234463763.1863.131.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Eilon Greenstein" Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:36:03 +0200 > Finally, an enhancement patch for the bnx2x. Due to many reasons (among > which FW stability and chasing some bugs) it took a while to stabilize > and the longer it took the longer the list got. So unfortunately, this > is a long list - hopefully for the last time. I realize that sending a > too many patches together is bad practice and I will do my best to avoid > it in the future. You're lucky I'm in a really good mood today :-) > The first patch is a new FW patch. It is way too big for the mailing > list, but I'm hoping you will get it directly to your mailbox. This > patch has very little review value since it is simply the new FW blob, > FW header file renames and the mandatory driver renames to accommodate > it. > > Please consider applying to net-next. Ok, everything is applied to net-next-2.6 and pushed out to kernel.org Please followup with patches for Ben Hutchings's feedback, as you promised you would. Thank you.