From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:29:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090217.142946.232071526.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090217095232.5da06b9f@werewolf.home> <200902172001.41804.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jamagallon@ono.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: arvidjaar@mail.ru Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41173 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752451AbZBQWaD (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:30:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200902172001.41804.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Andrey Borzenkov Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:01:38 +0300 > Forward to bonding and netdev ... > If IPv6 is disable in kernel config bonding loads. But I think it is > regression, it should be possible to disable IPv6 if not required. Don't configure ipv6 into your kernel, really. There is no other way to handle this. If we want to support IPV6 layer things in the bonding driver, it is going to call helper functions in the ipv6 module and therefore must be able to load it and use functions in it.