netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Tony Asleson <linux.netdev.list@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel behavior when returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY from hard_start_xmit
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:26:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090219132657.6df59e0e@extreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <587a3eeb0902191219r1c3e61dbkee1a5b45dceacc1b@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:19:10 -0600
Tony Asleson <linux.netdev.list@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am running into the following scenario and I wanted to verify that it is
> expected.
> 
> A user application does a single 8k UDP send.  While the Ethernet device
> driver is accepting each skb via hard_start_xmit it temporarily runs out
> of resources and calls netif_stop_queue and returns NETDEV_TX_BUSY.

> When the driver catches up it does a netif_wake_queue to resume skb
> transmission.  When this occurs during the UDP send, the Ethernet driver
> does not get any of the remaining skb buffers and the UDP send is
> incomplete.  However, the user application returns from the sendto
> with success.
> 
> Because UDP has no guaranteed delivery this seems like an acceptable thing.
> However, if a device driver imposes a limit to the number of skb buffers
> it can handle in flight which is < the total number of skb buffers it takes
> to complete.  The operation will never be successful.
> 
> For example, to support a single 64k UDP send, the device driver must be
> able to accept ~45 skb buffers (1500 MTU) without returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY.
> If the Ethernet device is unable to transmit faster than the arrival rate
> of skb buffers the driver then needs to queue them up.
> 
> Is this expected behavior or am I missing something in my driver?  How
> much should a device driver be expected to queue before calling
> netif_stop_queue and ensure normal packet transmission?  Why doesn't
> the network stack continue after the queue has been stopped?
> 
> Notes:
> -Linux 2.6.16.21 kernel (sles 10) embedded PPC platform.
> -Pseudo Ethernet device in question has ~2.8 MiB bandwidth.


Well written drivers never return TX_BUSY. They manage the queue
such that it is stopped when there is no space and only woken up
when there is space.

      reply	other threads:[~2009-02-19 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-19 20:19 Kernel behavior when returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY from hard_start_xmit Tony Asleson
2009-02-19 21:26 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090219132657.6df59e0e@extreme \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=linux.netdev.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).