From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/11]Get rid of all the old macro DMA_nBIT_MASK and use DMA_BIT_MASK(n) instead Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:14:09 -0800 Message-ID: <20090219151409.0d61de2a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <499CFDC8.1070600@cn.fujitsu.com> <499D0221.9090407@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090219081403.GA5400@elte.hu> <499D1ED9.4040005@cn.fujitsu.com> <499D2728.1080208@cn.fujitsu.com> <499D54F6.7000108@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20090219150851.GC22611@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, petkovbb@googlemail.com To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:35615 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755349AbZBSXPU (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:15:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090219150851.GC22611@elte.hu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:08:51 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stefan Richter wrote: > > > Yang Hongyang wrote: > > > v1->v2:fix s/micro/macro typo and keep the old defines > > > of DMA_nBIT_MASK > > > ---------------------- > > > Replace all DMA_nBIT_MASK macro with the new DMA_BIT_MASK(n) macro > > > > > > 01:Replace all DMA_64BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(64) > > > 02:Replace all DMA_48BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(48) > > > 03:Replace all DMA_40BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(40) > > > 04:Replace all DMA_39BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(39) > > > 05:Replace all DMA_35BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(35) > > > 06:Replace all DMA_32BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(32) > > > 07:Replace all DMA_31BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(31) > > > 08:Replace all DMA_30BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(30) > > > 09:Replace all DMA_28BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(28) > > > 10:Replace all DMA_24BIT_MASK macro with DMA_BIT_MASK(24) > > > 11:Update the old macro DMA_nBIT_MASK related documentations > > > > > > > Shouldn't you organize the patch series per subsystem, not per old > > macro? And then Cc the respective maintainers? > > > > As it stands, the patches cannot be routed through the normal channels; > > yet there is no fundamental reason to handle these patches differently > > from normal patches. > > Traditionally such trivially correct convert-it-all patches > lived in -mm and were merged upstream in one go, near the end of > the merge window. > > Sprinkling it into dozens of subsystem channels (some of which > are very unreliable) is neither good nor an economic use of our > resources. > > Patches that can potentially cause trouble should go via the > usual channels. > yes, fun. I hit several rejects merging these, easily fixed. After this lot is merged there will probably be a few unconverted sites which will need a second pass. After that we can think about removing the old #defines.