From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg Lindahl <greg@blekko.com>
Subject: Re: Treason uncloaked / Broken peer again
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:50:30 -0800
Message-ID: <20090221215030.GA8543@bx9.net>
References: <20090221195829.GA14779@bx9.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902212317410.20526@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from rc.bx9.net ([64.13.160.15]:50572 "EHLO rc.bx9.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753746AbZBUVub (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:50:31 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902212317410.20526@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Ilpo J=E4rvinen wrote:

> A case I remember top of the hat is related to shrinking of=20
> advertized window due to granularity steps because of window
> scaling. Fixed 2.6.22-26 timeframe iirc.

I have a dozen hosts running 2.6.24.7, and 1 has some treason
complaining about a RHEL 5.2 host (2.6.18+redhat). Of course, it could
be a different bug, or caused by the other side. I'm a bit weak
at understanding which side is guilty in your explanation.

-- greg