netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Subject: Re: [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2100: race between isr_indicate_associated and rx path
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:15:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902241315.43128.helmut.schaa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235446447.6354.549.camel@debian>

Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 schrieb Zhu Yi:

[...]

> Thanks for the analysis. Are you sure noop_qdisc is still used when we
> are about to netif_carrier_on() after receiving the association success
> response? 

Yes, had a printk in noop_enqueue.

> From dev_open(), dev_activate() is called after netdev->open.
> So the txq->qdisc_sleeping should be already replaced with pfifo_fast.
> But the state is still DEACTIVATED.

Right. But for example when a connection cannot be established by ipw2100
it will call netif_carrier_off on disassociation which in turn leads to a
call to dev_deavtivate. Hence, it is possible that a noop_qdisc is
assigned while the device is up and carrier is off.

> Should the packet from 
> wpa_supplicant be dropped by dev_queue_xmit()?
>
> > So, how should I proceed here?
> > 
> > Some possibilities that come to mind:
> > 
> > 1) let the noop_qdisc return NET_XMIT_DROP instead of NET_XMIT_CN and extend
> >    wpa_supplicant to retry after a short timeout. Already tried this approach
> >    and it works fine for me. wpa_supplicant typically needs one retry (200ms
> >    delay) until the frame is successfully send out.
> > 
> > 2) Run activate_dev somehow without a delay. I guess this could be achieved by
> >    changing linkwatch_urgent_event. I haven't tested this yet. But I guess we
> >    would still have a small race here.
> > 
> > 3) Wait until activate_dev was called in ipw2100 before replaying the cached
> >    frames.
> 
> I think making a sync version of netif_carrier_on/activate_dev should be
> the way to go. This could be a requirement from wireless. In wired
> network, netif_carrier_on() is called after a network cable plug event
> is detected. Some delay should be OK.

Maybe, but I can imagine a similar race when using a wired 802.1x secured
network. The switch might send an EAP-request very quickly after the carrier
was detected.

> But in wireless, 
> netif_carrier_on() is usually called after an association is succeeded.
> The driver has already some management frames transfered with AP. Now
> it's the time to open the data frame transmission. The driver requires
> to get the activate_dev() result (synchronously or via callback) because
> otherwise the driver has no idea when the Qdisc is ready and then it can
> start to deliver data frames to network stack and user space.

Exactly.

[...]

Helmut


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-24 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200901211734.48625.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <200901271521.24395.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <200902051511.31268.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
2009-02-23 10:38     ` [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2100: race between isr_indicate_associated and rx path Helmut Schaa
2009-02-23 18:08       ` Jouni Malinen
2009-02-24  7:36         ` Helmut Schaa
     [not found]       ` <200902231138.58067.helmut.schaa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-24  3:34         ` Zhu Yi
2009-02-24 12:15           ` Helmut Schaa [this message]
     [not found]             ` <200902241315.43128.helmut.schaa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-25  1:18               ` Zhu Yi
2009-02-25 12:39                 ` Helmut Schaa
     [not found]                   ` <200902251340.02010.helmut.schaa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-27  0:55                     ` Zhu Yi
2009-03-03 11:33                       ` Helmut Schaa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902241315.43128.helmut.schaa@gmail.com \
    --to=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).