From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Pull request: bluetooth-next-2.6 2009-02-27 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:51:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090226.225129.93967402.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1235712929.27004.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: marcel@holtmann.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34946 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752543AbZB0Gvp (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:51:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1235712929.27004.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Marcel Holtmann Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:35:29 +0100 > these are the Bluetooth patches for the 2.6.30 kernel release. All of > them have been in bluetooth-testing.git for a while. We tested them > heavily at the last UnPlugFest and also against the qualification test > system. > > The majority of these patches improve the Simple Pairing support and > ensures that we have the best interoperability while enforcing the best > possible security protection. > > The problems with SCO/eSCO establishment should now all be fixed. Some > Bluetooth chips are just too stupid to do the right thing. > > The Android guys found a few race conditions with the L2CAP connection > setup and they should also be fixed now. > > The Bluetooth USB driver now submits its bulk URBs together with the > interrupt URBs. This is a stupid requirement, but some Bluetooth chips > didn't like the missing bulk URBs at all. ... > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/holtmann/bluetooth-next-2.6.git master Pulled, thanks a lot Marcel.