From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Subject: Re: Documentation:Update the INDEX of the documents
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:04:11 -0600
Message-ID: <200902260004.13382.rob@landley.net>
References: <49A4F06B.6030205@cn.fujitsu.com> <49A5E72C.1080804@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090226023714.GH1363@mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Yang Hongyang <imhy.yang@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com,
	rdunlap@xenotime.net
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:56071
	"EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752672AbZBZGEQ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:04:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20090226023714.GH1363@mit.edu>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Wednesday 25 February 2009 20:37:14 Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 08:49:48AM +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote:
> > Yeah ,if we do this one-line summary thing,we still have to go through
> > all these documents. So why not just update the 00-INDEX and then tell
> > the authors that will add docs to the kernel do the "00-INDEX work"
> >  themselves?
>
> The difference is that if we go through the documents, it's something
> we do *once*.  And after the convention has been established, in the
> long term, it should be less work for all concerned.

I envy your optimisim.

Rob