From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Documentation:Update the INDEX of the documents
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:37:14 -0500
Message-ID: <20090226023714.GH1363@mit.edu>
References: <49A4F06B.6030205@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090225145950.GJ7064@mit.edu> <a669f14b0902250725j4c21463eqc1b88092486f38ad@mail.gmail.com> <20090225155628.GM7064@mit.edu> <49A5E72C.1080804@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Yang Hongyang <imhy.yang@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com,
	rdunlap@xenotime.net
To: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1756783AbZBZChk@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49A5E72C.1080804@cn.fujitsu.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 08:49:48AM +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote:
> Yeah ,if we do this one-line summary thing,we still have to go through
> all these documents. So why not just update the 00-INDEX and then tell
> the authors that will add docs to the kernel do the "00-INDEX work"
>  themselves?

The difference is that if we go through the documents, it's something
we do *once*.  And after the convention has been established, in the
long term, it should be less work for all concerned.

     	      	     	     	      	  - Ted