From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: Kernel problem Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:19:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20090226131948.GB6294@ff.dom.local> References: <20090226093902.GA12753@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090226105616.GA5754@ff.dom.local> <20090226115604.GA13592@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090226.041037.134928084.davem@davemloft.net> <20090226130631.GA14125@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , ash@sevsky.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.218.178]:49526 "EHLO mail-bw0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753411AbZBZNT4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:19:56 -0500 Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so497730bwz.37 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:19:53 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090226130631.GA14125@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:06:31PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 04:10:37AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > > netpoll supports receiving packets and has a trap handler to eat them > > to avoid packets it is interested in going into the real stack. > > (netpoll_receive_skb, netpoll_rx_skb, etc.) > > OK after much head scratching and staring, it turns out that > this is caused by the VLAN path not doing the netpoll check > which would normally drop the packets when a printk is active. Yes, nice catch/scratch! Cheers, Jarek P.