Re: 2.6.29-rc5-git3 Leak r=1 3

[Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>]

On Sunday 22 February 2009 09:57:24 David Miller wrote:
> From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:44:27 +0200 (EET)
>
> > [PATCH] tcp: fix retrans_out leaks in shifting code
> >
> > There's conflicting assumptions in shifting, the caller assumes
> > that dupsack results in S'ed skbs (or a part of it) for sure but
> > never gave a hint to tcp_sacktag_one when dsack is actually in
> > use. Thus DSACK retrans_out -= pcount was not taken and the
> > counter became out of sync. Remove obstacle from that information
> > flow to get DSACKs accounted in tcp_sacktag_one as expected.
> >
> > Compile tested only.
> >
> > In general the call to tcp_sacktag_one with the later full shift
> > from already SACKed skb should not be there, it's just doing
> > duplicating work already done earlier so it just wastes cycles and
> > also seems to duplicate small amount of code unnecessarily :-/.
> > However, moving tcp_sacktag_one call one level up is not what I want
> > to do in mainline -rc5, the counting & seqno state manipulation that
> > is going on there is just too hairy to get right in a hurry (order
> > is very significant there as the state transition is in progress
> > making normal invariants are not to be trusted). Luckily
> > tcp_sacktag_one is effectively a no-op atm with dup_sack set to 0
> > for already SACKed skb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
>
> Can you do some testing on this before I toss it into
> net-next-2.6? :-)  It looks fine to be, but... so did
> Herbert's URG change :)
Tested-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>

No crashes for sure, running for 5 hours, no Leak messages appearing too.
Test will continue more, after 20 hours more i can tell for sure, if it helps 
or not.