From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Vlan interface nuisance
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 21:24:30 +0100
Message-ID: <20090302202430.GA3211@ami.dom.local>
References: <20090301204731.40ce346a@nehalam> <49AC2BD1.4070209@candelatech.com> <49AC2E32.2020403@gmail.com> <200903022123.16032.denys@visp.net.lb>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:37296 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752359AbZCBUYs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:24:48 -0500
Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so2153071fxm.37
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:24:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200903022123.16032.denys@visp.net.lb>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:23:15PM +0200, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote:
...
> But IMHO ethN.Y more intuitive understandable.

Happily there is a choice. On the other hand, I guess the main question
here is if it's OK to use different defaults depending on a config tool.

Jarek P.