From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
gospo@redhat.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, willy@linux.intel.com,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] PCI: Add PCI quirk to disable L0s ASPM state for 82575 and 82598
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:02:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090306010207.GA829@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090305.163108.70528099.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 04:31:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:05:26 -0700
>
> > I'm not going to ack this patch at this point, let's just give it a day.
>
> More than a day has passed, how long are we going to let this
> patch sit and rot?
>
> Do we have to wait until Jesse gets back? That doesn't sound
> reasonable to me.
A lot of the discussion on this happened face-to-face; Jeff, Linus and I
were all at the same conference this week. I have put it in a pci fixes
tree, which I now have to pull apart again because one of the earlier
patches needs to be dropped. I'm getting on a plane tonight and flying
home, so I'll be pushing this fix to Linus tomorrow.
Sorry for not keeping you in the loop on this one.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-06 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-04 2:03 [net-next PATCH 1/2] PCI: Add PCI quirk to disable L0s ASPM state for 82575 and 82598 Jeff Kirsher
2009-03-04 2:03 ` [net-next PATCH 2/2] igb: remove ASPM L0s workaround Jeff Kirsher
2009-03-04 4:05 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2] PCI: Add PCI quirk to disable L0s ASPM state for 82575 and 82598 Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-06 0:31 ` David Miller
2009-03-06 1:02 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-03-06 1:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090306010207.GA829@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).