From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] PCI: Add PCI quirk to disable L0s ASPM state for 82575 and 82598 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:02:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20090306010207.GA829@parisc-linux.org> References: <20090304020308.15176.40527.stgit@lost.foo-projects.org> <20090304040526.GB1884@parisc-linux.org> <20090305.163108.70528099.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, willy@linux.intel.com, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:51711 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754629AbZCFBC0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:02:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090305.163108.70528099.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 04:31:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:05:26 -0700 > > > I'm not going to ack this patch at this point, let's just give it a day. > > More than a day has passed, how long are we going to let this > patch sit and rot? > > Do we have to wait until Jesse gets back? That doesn't sound > reasonable to me. A lot of the discussion on this happened face-to-face; Jeff, Linus and I were all at the same conference this week. I have put it in a pci fixes tree, which I now have to pull apart again because one of the earlier patches needs to be dropped. I'm getting on a plane tonight and flying home, so I'll be pushing this fix to Linus tomorrow. Sorry for not keeping you in the loop on this one. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."