From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lennert Buytenhek Subject: Re: Marvell 88E609x switch? Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:34:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20090310093459.GJ4738@xi.wantstofly.org> References: <49A80606.1040508@mlbassoc.com> <20090227152721.GG17040@xi.wantstofly.org> <49A806C5.1010200@mlbassoc.com> <20090227153102.GH17040@xi.wantstofly.org> <49A80A75.8000101@mlbassoc.com> <20090227155224.GK17040@xi.wantstofly.org> <49A97669.80309@mlbassoc.com> <1235988885.30736.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Gary Thomas , netdev To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from xi.wantstofly.org ([80.101.37.227]:45021 "EHLO xi.wantstofly.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753559AbZCJJfC (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:35:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1235988885.30736.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > If you will send me the current patches/code, then I'll use some time > > monday to look at the register settings to see if I can spot the problem, > > by corrolating with my device driver. > > Looking through my old code I found this comment, which indicate that > you should take care of PPU (Phy Polling Unit) state... I had to support > both the 6095 and 6097 chip. PPU disabling/enabling should be handled by the current code already, as it is also necessary for the 6131 (but not for the 6161/6165/etc).